Blog
A Thought Experiment: Why grade? Why test? What if?
Let’s try a thought experiment. Let’s assume we live in a culture where all forms of educational achievement tests have been banned and no one is allowed to assign a letter or numerical grade for anything. How would we evaluate what students are learning? How would we decide which teachers were doing their job effectively or how they could be more effective? Would there be objective (i.e. impartial, unbiased) ways of determining who was the smartest student and who needed help? And why would we want or need to know that? Without testing, would being the best be a useful question? Or, as a mathematician would ask, would that question be an interesting one (one that could yield an answer that wasn’t simply a circular restating of the question)? How would the content and methods of education change if assessment by means of testing and grading was banned?… more
Cathy, et al.:
This is very timely, as we're having a series of campus conversations about grade inflation and the culture of grading.
"What would we come up with if we could start over, from scratch?"
Here's one of my favorite long-range dreams:
- We re-envision our institutions as interdisciplinary think tanks.
- We tell students that they aren't in school anymore, they are functioning, early-career members of research teams, digital media production groups, architectural design teams, management consulting groups, performance companies, etc.
- Students and faculty work together on these teams addressing research-driven problems and creative challenges. These teams would produce actual work products and contribute them to society. When there is economic value to the work, students share in the revenue and royalties.
- Grades would be irrelevant in an organization like this. Assessment and evaluation would blend input from peers, supervisors, mentors, project clients, and especially the individuals themselves. This experience is more like the so-called real world, including the academic world once you're done taking classes for a grade. Widespread use of tools like e-portfolios make this much more feasible than in the past.
- We'll keep plenty of classrooms and lecture halls available for work-in-progress talks, interest group meetings, and for faculty who are good enough lecturers to attract listeners who don't need credit or a grade.
I've worked in higher ed for 25 years and could list all of the reasons why this won't work, but let's not bother with that right now. What do you think?
Teaching, Texting, and Twittering with Obama
With the first year of the Obama administration officially coming to a close, educators have been thinking about how the president’s online presence could be used for both civic education and media literacy purposes. Obama came into office with the promise of delivering web-based participatory democracy or “Government 2.0” to citizens. But I have found myself arguing that Obama’s “embrace” of online practices was actually quite limited, when it came to the messages he was promulgating. I am also not alone in wondering if online commenting and voting really constitutes democratic engagement.… more
Thanks for this interesting post and the links to other projects that are making use of Pres Obama's rhetoric and technology as a way of analyzing both. I'm wondering if anyone has also been studying the link between new and traditional media in this regard, as well as that link for others--such as the Tea Party or Sarah Palin or Scott Brown phenomenon. In other words, I'm wondering how "old media" such as newspapers and cable TV and talk radio disseminate the same or different messages and whether audiences are differentiated? What is the relationship between so-called viral media and broadcast media as a civic message? The "before" and "after" (unedited versus carefully edited) versions of Jon Stewart's appearance on the O'Reilly Show or Fox cutting away from the President's stirring meeting with the Republican Caucus when it wasn't turning out so well for the Caucus make me think that it is also important to teach students about issues of censorship, civic responsibility, communication, audience, and the values (and their corruption) of traditional journalism even as we look at the role of all of these in new media.
Thanks again for such a thoughtful and provocative discussion.
"Game Changer" Competition
Take a few minutes and help influence the next generation of games. The 2010 game design competition sponsored by HASTAC and the MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning program is looking for help in deciding which games and designers deserve to advance. The narratives in this year's proposals are innovative, fun, gripping and timely, including: finding a missing genius scientist, repelling invaders of human consciousness, rescuing victims of a killer earthquake, and the proper care and feeding of aliens. They all feature provocative characters, including: “Sackboy,” a Geico-like lizard named “Sal,” an invisible time traveling professor named “Momo,” and many others.… more





